Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Grammar Faux Pas

Ok, I’ll admit it. I’m a sign reader. I am one of those people that as they drive around they find all of the grammatical and spelling mistakes on the business signs around town. I’ve done it for years and I don’t see an end to it anytime in the near future. I don’t get paid for this, but I can’t seem to stop myself from mentally correcting the offending mistakes that I see all around me everyday. Perhaps it is the editor in me.

I think that what really drives me crazy is when I see spelling and grammatical mistakes in published pieces. It is one thing to roll your eyes at a sign when you drive by, and an entirely different matter to find it done by another professional in your line of work. It makes me cringe. It is like fingernails scraping across a chalkboard. These are people who should know better.

When it comes to bad grammar, I’ve seen it all. And I don’t mean that I’ve seen it all because I’m a mom to an almost teenager. These are mistakes made by people I consider colleagues in the writing world. The incorrect uses of then and than or accept and except. The misuse of lose and loose. (C’mon people, it’s lose weight, not loose weight.) The incorrect use of edition for addition or affect for effect and vice versa. I could go on and on and on. And lest you think these are all by the same person, think again. There are several guilty offenders, although there are some who have made multiple offenses.

Now, while I am not meaning to be the grammar police, I do think that it would behoove us as writers to be very sure of what we publish. When we make mistakes such as the ones I have listed, we lose credibility. Once that is lost, it is difficult to get it back.

I know I am not perfect, nor do I pretend to be…except with my son. But this is an issue that we need to perhaps take just a little more seriously as professional writers.

Oh, my favorite mistake this past week? C’mon…laugh with me…Wendsday for Wednesday. What are some of your favorites?

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Should You Sign A Non-Compete Contract?

I was recently hired by a group that wanted me to ghostwrite short 250 word articles for their client. I originally thought that this would be a good and reliable writing gig. The contract was to be for a one year period, but could go on for about three years.

I went through the process of joining the team and then things quickly changed. They decided that everyone on the team would need to sign new contracts that included a non-compete clause. This clause stated that you could not work for any of their direct or indirect clients for a period of one year after leaving their writing team. I could not work directly or indirectly for any of these clients. That really bothered me. I have been burned in two other careers by signing a non-compete contract. I didn’t start freelance writing to have my efforts controlled and dictated by someone other than myself.

My question is this: If I leave this team and get work from someone else, what kind of a nightmare am I going to have to make sure that I do not work for anyone that the original team sees as a client? They are currently working on gaining more clients everyday. If I am already working for one of their “new” clients, then what happens? Will I be sued?

I sent off an email that detailed my hesitation to sign such a contract. I received a very professional response in return, that explained why they are taking this stance. While I appreciate the reasoning that they have for such a decision and their professionalism, I cannot in good conscience sign a contract that limits my future work.

Some of their writers were taking their topics and directly approaching the client with the work before the group would submit it. That is not ethical and I would never do that. It is also highly unprofessional. However, while I would never directly go after their current clients, I cannot guarantee that any of their future clients will not be ones that I would choose to work with on my own either now or in the future. What if I contracted work with the client on my own in a different forum before they were a client for this group? That is an entirely different situation that they refuse to see.

A non-compete clause or contract only serves to protect the interests of the employer or first party. They are limiting their future competition in the market. The person who signs such a contract is giving up their freedom to work.

Doesn’t freelance imply the right to work where I choose? Doesn’t freelance imply freedom?